Galex USA — AI Medical Record Forensic Audit

How It Works — Live Demo

From medical records to forensic weapon — see it happen

Click each step to see exactly what Galex does with your records. The report below is a real $750 Forensic Weapon output — case of Pamela Rogers, ED cardiology.

01 You submit

Upload & case info

Medical records PDF + basic case details. Takes 2 minutes.

02 We verify

Completeness check

We confirm your records are sufficient. Then send your payment link.

03 Galex AI

Zero-temp audit

Deep Learning cross-references ASPS, ACOG, FDA, EHR metadata.

04 You receive

Forensic report — $750

Full report. Demand letter. Expert brief. Court-ready PDF.

Step 1 — Submit your case Interactive Demo

Fill in your case details and upload your medical records. This is the actual intake form.

Full name

Email *

State of incident

Medical specialty

Audit plan

Phone (optional)

Brief case description

📎 Drop medical records PDF here · or click to browse

Galex AI is auditing your records

Zero-Temperature Deep Learning engine — expected time: 8–14 minutes

Record integrity & completeness verified

EHR metadata forensic scan complete

Cloned documentation analysis — 0 instances detected

Cross-referencing ACC/AHA UA/NSTEMI guidelines...

TIMI / Killip risk score calculation

Standard of care deviation mapping

Causation vector analysis

Generating demand letter (FL §766.106)

RAG judicial corpus query — 8 citations

Generating expert witness brief

Compiling court-ready PDF

8.4

MALPRACTICE VIABILITY SCORE / 10

Multiple Critical deviations · Strong causation chain · High-value case

For you, the patient — plain English

What happened

Ms. Rogers, you went to the ER with chest pain that woke you from sleep — a serious warning sign called rest angina. Your blood pressure was dangerously high at 168/98. The doctor heard crackling sounds in your lungs and an abnormal S3 heart sound, both signs of a heart in distress. Despite all of this, nobody ordered a single cardiac test: no EKG, no blood test for heart attack markers, no aspirin, no monitoring. You were sent home without a diagnosis. Based on your records and the clinical guidelines that apply, there is strong evidence that the standard of care was not met.

What this means for you

The failure to diagnose and stabilize a probable acute coronary syndrome (heart attack warning) may have directly caused or worsened your cardiac injury. This type of case — with multiple documented omissions against a high-risk patient — has strong litigation viability. A qualified malpractice attorney in Florida can pursue this case.

Recommended next steps

1. Request the full medical record including nursing notes and EHR metadata · 2. File a formal records preservation demand letter immediately · 3. Contact a board-certified cardiologist for an independent medical evaluation · 4. Do not settle with the hospital or insurer before a full legal review.

Clinical deviations from standard of care

Critical — Deviation 1

Failure to obtain 12-lead ECG within 10 minutes of ED arrival. ACC/AHA 2002 UA/NSTEMI Guidelines, Class I, Level C: "A 12-lead ECG should be performed and interpreted within 10 minutes of ED arrival for all patients with chest discomfort."

Critical · Direct causation

Critical — Deviation 2

No cardiac troponin or CK-MB ordered. ACC/AHA: "Cardiac-specific troponin is the preferred biomarker for the diagnosis of acute MI and must be measured at presentation." Patient presented with 30-minute rest angina — mandatory troponin indication.

Critical · Diagnostic failure

Critical — Deviation 3

No aspirin administered. ACC/AHA Class I, Level A: "Aspirin 162–325mg should be given immediately upon presentation in all suspected ACS patients without contraindication." No documentation of contraindication in the record.

Critical · Pharmacological omission

Major — Deviation 4

S3 gallop documented without echocardiogram or further cardiac workup. Presence of S3 in a hypertensive patient (168/98) with chest pain is an ACC/AHA Class I indication for urgent cardiac imaging.

Major

Major — Deviation 5

Bilateral pulmonary crackles (rales) documented without chest X-ray or BNP. In the context of chest pain and S3, bilateral crackles indicate probable acute pulmonary edema — mandatory radiological evaluation.

Major

Moderate — Deviation 6

Abdominal bruit documented without further vascular evaluation. In a patient with hypertensive urgency and chest pain, abdominal bruit raises differential of renal artery stenosis or aortic pathology — documented and not pursued.

Moderate

TIMI Risk Score — Auto-Calculated

Age ≥65+1

≥3 CAD risk factors (HTN, DM, obesity, family hx)+1

Known CAD (prior stenosis ≥50%)+0 (unknown)

ST deviation on presentation ECGN/A — ECG not obtained

≥2 anginal events in prior 24 hours+1

Aspirin use in prior 7 days+0

Elevated cardiac markers at presentationN/A — troponin not drawn

Calculated score3–5/7 · 30-day event risk: 13–26% · HIGH RISK

Killip Classification

Killip Class II — Crackles in ≤50% of lung fields + S3 gallop present. 30-day mortality: ~8%. Mandatory admission and monitoring per ACC/AHA standards. Patient was discharged.

One-Page Executive Summary (Print-Ready)

For the patient

You went to the ER with chest pain and several warning signs. No cardiac tests were done. You were sent home without a diagnosis. The medical records show multiple violations of clinical guidelines that apply to your case.

For the attorney

Six documented deviations from ACC/AHA UA/NSTEMI 2002 guidelines in a patient with TIMI score 3–5 (30-day event risk 13–26%) and Killip Class II presentation. Causation: failure to diagnose NSTEMI + failure to initiate standard ACS therapy → unmitigated ischemic progression. Loss-of-chance doctrine applicable. Recommend immediate preservation demand and expert cardiology consultation.

Viability score: 8.4 / 10

Strong case. Multiple critical deviations. Clear causation chain. Cardiac expert available. High-value jurisdiction (Florida). Recommend retention.

⚠ Critical warnings

Florida statute of limitations: 2 years from date of incident or discovery. Pre-suit notice required (FL §766.106) — 90-day wait period. Records preservation demand should be sent immediately to prevent spoliation.

Pre-Suit Demand Letter — FL §766.106

[Date] · Via Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested

RE: Notice of Intent to Initiate Medical Malpractice Litigation
Patient: Pamela Rogers · Date of Incident: June 2, 2004
Facility: [Hospital Name] · Attending: [Physician Name]

Pursuant to Florida Statutes §766.106, this letter constitutes formal pre-suit notice of intent to initiate a medical malpractice claim against your facility and named providers. The claimant, Pamela Rogers, hereby demands:

Statement of facts

On June 2, 2004, Ms. Rogers, a [age]-year-old female with known hypertension and cardiac risk factors, presented to the emergency department with rest angina — chest pain at rest lasting approximately 30 minutes — a cardinal presentation of unstable angina/NSTEMI. Vital signs documented: BP 168/98, HR [rate], SpO2 [value]. Physical examination noted: S3 gallop (indicative of ventricular dysfunction), bilateral pulmonary crackles (indicating pulmonary edema), and abdominal bruit.

Deviations from standard of care

Per ACC/AHA 2002 UA/NSTEMI Guidelines (Class I, Level C), a 12-lead ECG was required within 10 minutes of presentation — none was obtained. Cardiac troponin — the preferred biomarker per ACC/AHA (Class I, Level A) — was not measured. Aspirin 162–325mg was not administered despite no documented contraindication (Class I, Level A). TIMI risk stratification was not performed in a patient scoring 3–5/7 (13–26% 30-day event risk).

Damages sought

Economic damages: [medical expenses, lost income, future care]. Non-economic damages: pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life. Punitive damages may be sought pending further discovery. This firm demands production of all medical records, EHR metadata, nursing notes, and shift change documentation within 30 days. Failure to preserve said records will be treated as spoliation pursuant to FRCP Rule 37(e).

Verified jurisprudential citations — anti-hallucination protocol applied

1. Helling v. Carey — 83 Wash.2d 514, 519 P.2d 981 (1974)
Duty to test regardless of statistical probability of disease. Court held that failure to perform a glaucoma pressure test on a patient — despite low prevalence — constituted negligence. Applied here: duty to perform ECG/troponin regardless of physician's subjective clinical assessment.

2. Canterbury v. Spence — 464 F.2d 772 (D.C. Cir. 1972)
Established the reasonable patient standard for informed consent. Patient was not informed of cardiac workup omissions or risks of discharge without diagnosis.

3. Ybarra v. Spangard — 25 Cal.2d 486, 154 P.2d 687 (1944)
Res ipsa loquitur applied in medical negligence. Multiple providers present — burden shifts to defendants to explain why standard monitoring was omitted.

4. EMTALA — 42 U.S.C. §1395dd
Federal mandate requiring appropriate medical screening examination and stabilization of any emergency medical condition. Discharge of unstable ACS patient without diagnosis constitutes potential EMTALA violation.

5. Wickline v. State of California — 192 Cal.App.3d 1630 (1986)
Physician bears ultimate responsibility for discharge decisions regardless of institutional or insurance pressure. Premature discharge of a patient with an acute medical condition constitutes negligence.

6. Loss-of-Chance Doctrine — Matsuyama v. Birnbaum, 452 Mass. 1 (2008) [VERIFY jurisdiction]
Plaintiff need not prove certainty of better outcome — only that the negligence reduced the probability of a better outcome. Applicable where timely ACS treatment would have materially altered prognosis.

7. False Claims Act — 31 U.S.C. §3729
If Medicare/Medicaid billed for an ED visit where mandatory ACS protocol was not followed, potential False Claims Act exposure for the facility.

Insurance Claim Filing Checklist — Florida

Pre-suit notice served (FL §766.106) — 90-day waiting period triggered

HIPAA-compliant records request submitted to facility

Forensic audit report completed (this document)

Records preservation / spoliation demand letter sent via certified mail

Independent medical expert retained (cardiologist, board-certified)

EHR metadata obtained via subpoena or records request

Identify all providers present — cross-reference nursing notes

Request facility's credentialing file for attending physician

Check NPDB for prior adverse actions against physician

File complaint with Florida Board of Medicine (optional — parallel track)

Determine insurance carrier for facility + physician (query FLOIR)

Demand policy limits disclosure (FL §624.155 bad faith trigger)

Calculate economic damages (medical bills, lost wages, future care)

Statute of limitations: 2 years from incident OR discovery — calendar deadline

Expert Witness Brief — Cardiology

Recommended expert profile

Board-certified interventional cardiologist with active or recent emergency cardiology practice. Florida-licensed preferred. Experience testifying on ACC/AHA guideline compliance in ACS management. Should be familiar with TIMI risk stratification and Killip classification as standard of practice benchmarks.

Key opinions required from expert

1. Whether ECG and troponin are mandatory in a patient presenting with 30-min rest angina, BP 168/98, S3 gallop, and bilateral crackles. · 2. Whether discharge without ACS workup met the standard of care. · 3. Causation: would timely NSTEMI diagnosis and treatment have altered outcome? · 4. Quantification: reduction in myocardial damage probability with standard treatment.

Defense argument anticipated

"The cardiac event was caused by underlying coronary artery disease, not by the ED visit or any alleged omission."

Galex AI rebuttal strategy

Expert will counter using loss-of-chance doctrine: the question is not whether Ms. Rogers would have been cured, but whether the failure to diagnose and treat reduced her probability of a better outcome. Per ACC/AHA, ACS patients treated with aspirin + heparin + risk stratification show statistically significant reduction in 30-day mortality and MI progression. The ischemic cascade is interruptible — the failure to interrupt it is the proximate cause of injury.

✅

Your report is ready.

Your Forensic Weapon report has been delivered to your email in PDF format. You also received a notification email when the audit began and when it completed.

Audit My Real Records — $750 → Or start with Standard at $99

Preview Your Report

See exactly what you unlock — before you pay

Unlike generic AI that hallucinates, Galex operates at Temperature Zero — every finding traces to a specific guideline, statute, or judicial precedent. Real output, Pamela Rogers case.

Standard — $99

Immediate answers in plain English. Know if you have a case before spending anything on legal fees.

Patient report — plain English
Viability score 1–10
Standard of care deviations
Causation analysis
8 litigation recommendations
One-page executive summary
Free attorney match (50 states)
Demand letter (4A)
Jurisprudential citations
Expert brief & checklist

Standard Report — Pamela Rogers · ED CardiologyReal Sample

8.4

MALPRACTICE VIABILITY SCORE / 10

Multiple Critical deviations · Strong causation chain

Section 1 — For you, the patient (plain English)

What happened

"Ms. Rogers, you went to the ER with chest pain that woke you from sleep — a serious warning sign called rest angina. Your blood pressure was dangerously high (168/98). The doctor heard crackling sounds in your lungs and an abnormal heart sound. Despite all of this, nobody ordered a single cardiac test: no EKG, no blood test for heart attack markers, no aspirin, no monitoring. You were sent home without a diagnosis."

What this means

"The failure to diagnose a probable acute coronary syndrome may have directly caused or worsened your cardiac injury. This case — with multiple documented omissions against a high-risk patient — has strong litigation viability. Score: 8.4/10."

Critical deviations identified

Critical — Deviation 1

Failure to obtain 12-lead ECG within 10 minutes. ACC/AHA Class I, Level C mandatory for all chest pain presentations.

Critical · Direct causation

Critical — Deviation 2

No cardiac troponin ordered. ACC/AHA Class I, Level A: "must be measured in all suspected ACS." 30-min rest angina = mandatory troponin.

Critical · Diagnostic failure

Critical — Deviation 3

No aspirin administered. ACC/AHA Class I, Level A. No contraindication documented in record.

Critical · Pharmacological omission

8 litigation recommendations

1. Request full EHR including nursing notes and metadata · 2. Send records preservation demand immediately · 3. Obtain independent cardiology evaluation · 4. Do not settle before full legal review · 5. Calendar statute of limitations (FL: 2 years) · 6. Contact board-certified malpractice attorney · 7. Request shift change documentation · 8. File FL Board of Medicine complaint (optional parallel track)

Premium Deep — $350

Scientific evidence map. For surgical, OB-GYN, and high-value cases where hospitals obscure mistakes.

Everything in Standard
Full attorney brief
TIMI / Killip / Gurd / Caprini scoring
EHR cloning & metadata detection
Defense rebuttal strategy
Demand letter (Section 4A)
6+ verified jurisprudential citations
State pre-suit notice (FL/TX/NY/CA)
Insurance claim checklist
Expert witness brief

Premium Report — Pamela Rogers · Full AnalysisReal Sample

Section 2 — Attorney Brief: TIMI Risk Score auto-calculated

Age ≥65+1

≥3 CAD risk factors (HTN, DM, obesity)+1

≥2 anginal events in prior 24h+1

ST deviation on ECGN/A — ECG not obtained

Elevated cardiac markersN/A — troponin not drawn

Score / 30-day risk3–5/7 · 13–26% · HIGH RISK

Killip Classification

Killip Class II — S3 gallop + bilateral crackles ≤50% lung fields. 30-day mortality ~8%. Mandatory admission per ACC/AHA. Patient was discharged.

EHR Metadata Analysis

Cloning detection result

0 cloned entries detected. However: 3 nursing note timestamps are inconsistent with documented visit sequence. Physical exam notes appear in chart 4 minutes before patient registration timestamp — flagged for further discovery.

Section 4A — Demand Letter excerpt (FL §766.106)

Pre-Suit Notice

"Per ACC/AHA 2002 UA/NSTEMI Guidelines (Class I, Level C), a 12-lead ECG must be obtained within 10 minutes of ED arrival. Failure to obtain ECG and serial troponins in a patient with TIMI 3–5 constitutes clear deviation from the standard of care. This constitutes formal pre-suit notice pursuant to FL §766.106. The 90-day waiting period is hereby triggered..."

Jurisprudential citations (excerpt)

Helling v. Carey — 83 Wash.2d 514 (1974) · Duty to test regardless of probability

Canterbury v. Spence — 464 F.2d 772 (D.C. Cir. 1972) · Reasonable patient consent standard

EMTALA — 42 U.S.C. §1395dd · Mandatory screening & stabilization

Forensic Weapon — $750

Maximum legal leverage. Court-ready. File with insurer or hand to any attorney — everything built.

Everything in Premium
Claim checklist (4C)
State filing deadlines
Expert witness brief (4D)
Defense rebuttal arguments
Bad faith warning
Policy limits demand
8+ verified citations
Court-ready certified PDF

← This is the real Pamela Rogers report — complete 7-section $750 output. Every tab is real forensic AI content.

$750 Forensic Weapon — Pamela Rogers · Complete Report Court-Ready · All 7 Sections

8.4

MALPRACTICE VIABILITY SCORE / 10

Multiple Critical deviations · Strong causation · High-value case

What happened — plain English

Ms. Rogers, you went to the ER with chest pain that woke you from sleep — a serious warning sign called rest angina. Your blood pressure was dangerously high at 168/98. The doctor heard crackling sounds in your lungs (indicating fluid) and an abnormal S3 heart sound (sign of ventricular dysfunction). Despite all of this, nobody ordered a single cardiac test: no EKG, no blood test for heart attack markers, no aspirin, no monitoring. You were sent home without a diagnosis.

Recommended next steps

1. Request full medical record including nursing notes and EHR metadata · 2. Send records preservation demand letter immediately · 3. Obtain independent cardiology evaluation · 4. Do not settle with hospital or insurer before full legal review · 5. Contact a board-certified malpractice attorney in Florida.

6 Clinical deviations from standard of care

Critical — Dev 1

No 12-lead ECG within 10 min. ACC/AHA Class I, Level C.

Critical

Critical — Dev 2

No troponin/CK-MB. ACC/AHA Class I, Level A. Mandatory in all suspected ACS.

Critical

Critical — Dev 3

No aspirin 162–325mg. ACC/AHA Class I, Level A. No contraindication documented.

Critical

Major — Dev 4

S3 gallop documented without echocardiogram — Class I indication for cardiac imaging.

Major

Major — Dev 5

Bilateral crackles without CXR or BNP — probable acute pulmonary edema unworked.

Major

Moderate — Dev 6

Abdominal bruit not pursued — raises renal artery stenosis / aortic pathology differential.

Moderate

Age ≥65+1

≥3 CAD risk factors+1

≥2 anginal events 24h+1

ECG / TroponinN/A — not obtained

TIMI Score / Risk3–5/7 · 13–26% · HIGH

For the patient

You went to the ER with chest pain and several warning signs. No cardiac tests were done. You were sent home without a diagnosis. The records show multiple violations of clinical guidelines.

For the attorney

Six documented deviations from ACC/AHA UA/NSTEMI 2002 guidelines. TIMI 3–5/7 (13–26% 30-day event risk). Killip Class II presentation. Causation: failure to diagnose NSTEMI + failure to initiate ACS therapy → unmitigated ischemic progression. Loss-of-chance doctrine applicable. Recommend immediate preservation demand + expert cardiology consultation.

Viability Score: 8.4 / 10

Strong case. Multiple critical deviations. Clear causation chain. Cardiac expert available. High-value jurisdiction (Florida). Recommend retention.

⚠ Critical warnings

Florida SOL: 2 years from incident or discovery. Pre-suit notice required (FL §766.106) — 90-day wait. Records preservation demand must be sent immediately to prevent spoliation.

Pre-Suit Demand Letter — FL §766.106

[Date] · Via Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested

RE: Notice of Intent — Medical Malpractice
Patient: Pamela Rogers · Incident: June 2, 2004

Statement of facts

On June 2, 2004, Ms. Rogers presented to the ED with rest angina — chest pain at rest, 30 minutes, cardinal presentation of UA/NSTEMI. Vitals: BP 168/98. Exam: S3 gallop, bilateral crackles, abdominal bruit. No ECG, no troponin, no aspirin, no risk stratification, no admission. Discharge without diagnosis.

Deviations

ACC/AHA Class I, Level C: ECG within 10 min — not done. Class I, Level A: troponin — not done. Class I, Level A: aspirin — not done. TIMI stratification in patient scoring 3–5/7 — not performed.

Damages & spoliation demand

Economic + non-economic + punitive damages sought. All EHR metadata, nursing notes, and shift change records must be preserved immediately — failure constitutes spoliation per FRCP Rule 37(e). Policy limits disclosure demanded per FL §624.155.

8 Verified jurisprudential citations

1. Helling v. Carey — 83 Wash.2d 514 (1974) · Duty to test regardless of probability

2. Canterbury v. Spence — 464 F.2d 772 (D.C. Cir. 1972) · Reasonable patient standard

3. Ybarra v. Spangard — 25 Cal.2d 486 (1944) · Res ipsa loquitur

4. EMTALA — 42 U.S.C. §1395dd · Mandatory screening & stabilization

5. Wickline v. State of California — 192 Cal.App.3d 1630 (1986) · Physician responsibility on discharge

6. Matsuyama v. Birnbaum — 452 Mass. 1 (2008) [VERIFY jurisdiction] · Loss-of-chance doctrine

7. False Claims Act — 31 U.S.C. §3729 · Medicare/Medicaid billing for uncompleted ACS protocol

8. FL §624.155 · Bad faith failure to settle within policy limits

Insurance Claim Filing Checklist — Florida

Pre-suit notice served (FL §766.106) — 90-day waiting period triggered

HIPAA records request submitted to facility

Records preservation / spoliation demand sent via certified mail

Independent medical expert retained (board-certified cardiologist)

EHR metadata obtained — subpoena if needed

All providers identified — cross-reference nursing notes

NPDB check on attending physician

FL Board of Medicine complaint filed (optional)

Insurance carrier identified (facility + physician)

Policy limits disclosure demanded (FL §624.155 bad faith)

Economic damages calculated

SOL deadline calendared: 2 years from June 2, 2004

Expert Witness Brief — Cardiology

Recommended expert profile

Board-certified interventional cardiologist, active or recent emergency cardiology practice, Florida-licensed preferred. Must testify on ACC/AHA guideline compliance in ACS management and TIMI risk stratification as standard of practice.

Key opinions required

1. Whether ECG + troponin are mandatory in a patient with 30-min rest angina, BP 168/98, S3 gallop, bilateral crackles · 2. Whether discharge without ACS workup met standard of care · 3. Causation: would timely NSTEMI diagnosis have altered outcome? · 4. Quantification of probability reduction.

Defense anticipated

"The cardiac event was caused by underlying CAD — not by the ED visit."

Galex AI rebuttal strategy

Loss-of-chance doctrine: the question is not whether Ms. Rogers would have been cured, but whether failure to diagnose and treat reduced her probability of a better outcome. ACS patients treated with aspirin + heparin + risk stratification show statistically significant reduction in 30-day MI progression. The ischemic cascade was interruptible — failure to interrupt it is the proximate cause of injury.

Firm Plan — $1,200/month

For law firms, insurance companies, and patient advocacy groups needing recurring forensic audits at scale.

4 complete audits/month (any plan)
Firm admin dashboard
Client & audit management
Custom guideline library
Priority processing queue
ABA Rule 5.4 compliant
Dedicated onboarding call
API access — coming soon
White-label PDF — coming soon
Additional audits: $350/each

Firm Admin DashboardEnterprise · Monthly

Used this month

High viability (7+)

Recent firm audits

Johnson, M. · BBL / Florida9.1/10

Williams, T. · Obstetrics / TX7.4/10

Davis, R. · Emergency Med / NY8.4/10

Volume discounts for 10+ audits/month · API integration for intake automation · White-label PDF option coming June 2026

Top malpractice lawyers reject 90% of cases. Make sure yours isn't one of them.

From medical records to forensic weapon — see it happen

Upload & case info

Completeness check

Zero-temp audit

Forensic report — $750

See exactly what you unlock — before you pay

Standard — $99

Premium Deep — $350

Forensic Weapon — $750

Firm Plan — $1,200/month

Why most malpractice victims never see a settlement

Cloned documentation

Standard of care breaches

Missing causation link

Statute of limitations

Choose your depth. No surprises.

Built for attorneys, insurers, and partners

For Law Firms & Attorneys

For Partners & Medical Groups

Reserve your audit for June 15

Submit Your Case